Tampax Lawsuit 2026:
Check Your Settlement Eligibility
Independent studies found lead levels up to 40ร above EPA limits in Tampax Pearl and Radiant tampons. Multiple class actions are now active in federal court.
If you used Tampax Pearl or Radiant products, you may be entitled to compensation. Check your eligibility in 2 minutes โ free.
Why Trust This Site?
Built on peer-reviewed science and verified court filings โ not speculation.
Scientific Evidence
Detailed breakdowns of UC Berkeley & Columbia University studies that first detected heavy metals in Tampax products.
Read the science โActive Case Tracker
Real-time updates on Otkina v. P&G, Sanchez v. P&G, Barton v. P&G, and California Prop 65 notices.
Track the cases โFAQ & Payout Guide
Honest answers: No settlement exists yet. We explain what 'no proof' claims really mean and warn against scam sites.
Read the FAQ โEligibility Checker
Find out if your specific products โ Pearl Light, Regular, Super, Ultra, or Radiant โ appear in active filings.
Check eligibility โLatest Case Updates
All updatesCalifornia class certified for Tampax Pearl & Radiant buyers โ first class certification in the lead litigation
Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel certified a California buyer class (Tampax Pearl and Radiant purchases since July 29, 2020) for refund and labeling claims โ the first class certification in the Tampax lead litigation. A mandatory settlement conference is set for December 10, 2026.
Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company
New Prop 65 Notice Filed Against P&G for Lead in Products
The Environmental Research Center, Inc. filed a 60-day notice of violation against The Procter & Gamble Company and its manufacturing subsidiary regarding the presence of lead and lead compounds in their products.
California Prop 65 Notice (Environmental Research Center, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Company)
New Class Action Filed Regarding Toxic Chemicals in Feminine Hygiene Products
Originally filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on June 5, 2026, this class action was removed to federal court on July 9, 2026, alleging that various feminine hygiene products from P&G, Kimberly-Clark, and others contain PFAS and heavy metals causing reproductive harm.
Franco Lopez et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al.
The Products Under Scrutiny
Independent lab analysis found lead, arsenic, and cadmium in Tampax Pearl and Radiant products.
Tampax Pearl โ lead levels found up to 40ร above EPA limits in independent testing
Photo: Product image
Tampax Pearl's plastic applicator โ the specific product variant tested in the 2024 Ragusa et al. study
Photo: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
Tampax Radiant โ the second product line named in active class action filings alongside Pearl
Photo: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0
Tampax Pearl & Radiant sold for decades with no federal heavy metal testing requirements until 2024
Photo: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0Images used under Creative Commons licenses from Wikimedia Commons. No affiliation with Procter & Gamble or Tampax is implied. This site is an independent legal information resource.
TampaxLawsuit.com โ Most Searched Right Now
"How to join without a receipt"
Step-by-step guide using Amazon, Target & CVS order history as proof.
"Tampax lead levels vs EPA limits"
Interactive calculator: your usage vs. California Prop 65's 0.5 ฮผg/day threshold.
"Tampax lawsuit payout date 2026"
Honest answer: no settlement exists yet. Here's what to do now instead.
Paid advertisement. This is an attorney advertisement.
Do You Qualify? Select Your Case Type
Click a category below to expand and check your eligibility.